.
after it undergoes the following
transformations.
(i.) An enlargement with a scale factor of 2 about the centre $(0, -1)$.
(ii.) A reflection in the line $y = -x$.
, that are located on level ground.
is 15 km.
.
(a.) Assume that Quadrilateral
H has vertices
A, B, C, D
(i.) A visual observation of the transformation of Quadrilateral
H mapping onto Quadrilateral
N
suggests a rotation.
Let us verify this by examining the coordinate mapping.
$
\text{Quadrilateral } H \text{ onto Quadrilateral } N \\[3ex]
A(2, 3) \rightarrow A'(-3, 2) \\[3ex]
B(4, 1) \rightarrow B'(-1, 4) \\[3ex]
C(3, 0) \rightarrow C'(0, 3) \\[3ex]
D(2, 1) \rightarrow D'(-1, 2) \\[3ex]
$
(i.) For every point, the transformation follows the coordinate rule $(x, y) \rightarrow (-y, x)$, where
the
y-coordinate is negated and interchanged with the
x-coordinate.
This implies a counterclockwise rotation of 90° about the origin.
Therefore, the single transformation that maps Quadrilateral
H onto Quadrilateral
N is a
counterclockwise rotation of 90° about the origin (0, 0).
(ii.) A visual observation of the transformation of Quadrilateral
H onto Quadrilateral
P
suggests a translation.
Let us verify this by examining the coordinate mapping.
$
\text{Quadrilateral } H \text{ onto Quadrilateral } P \\[3ex]
A(2, 3) \rightarrow A'(4, -2) \\[3ex]
B(4, 1) \rightarrow B'(6, -4) \\[3ex]
C(3, 0) \rightarrow C'(5, -5) \\[3ex]
D(2, 1) \rightarrow D'(4, -4) \\[5ex]
\underline{\text{Change in } x-\text{coordinates}} \\[3ex]
4 - 2 = 2 \\[3ex]
6 - 4 = 2 \\[3ex]
5 - 3 = 2 \\[3ex]
4 - 2 = 2 \\[3ex]
\Delta x = 2 \quad\text{same for all vertices} \\[5ex]
\underline{\text{Change in } y-\text{coordinates}} \\[3ex]
-2 - 3 = -5 \\[3ex]
-4 - 1 = -5 \\[3ex]
-5 - 0 = -5 \\[3ex]
-4 - 1 = -5 \\[3ex]
\Delta y = -5 \quad\text{same for all vertices} \\[5ex]
\text{Every vertex of } H \text{ moves by the same vector } \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ -5 \end{pmatrix} \\[3ex]
$
This implies that the single transformation that maps Quadrilateral
H onto Quadrilateral
P is a
translation by the vector $\begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ -5 \end{pmatrix}$
(b.) An enlargement with a scale factor of 2 about the centre $(0, -1)$.
distance from center to image = scale factor * distance from center to object
$
(i.) \\[3ex]
\text{centre} = (0, -1) \\[3ex]
\text{scale factor} = 2 \\[5ex]
\text{Image of A, } A' \\[3ex]
\text{centre} (0, -1) \text{ to } A(2, 3) \\[5ex]
\text{horizontal change} = 2 - 0 = 2 \\[3ex]
\text{new horizontal change} = 2 \cdot 2 = 4 \\[3ex]
\text{new x-coordinate} = 0 + 4 = 4 \\[5ex]
\text{vertical change} = 3 - (-1) = 4 \\[3ex]
\text{new vertical change} = 2 \cdot 4 = 8 \\[5ex]
\text{new y-coordinate} = -1 + 8 = 7 \\[5ex]
A' = (4, 7) \\[5ex]
\text{Image of B, } B' \\[3ex]
\text{centre} (0, -1) \text{ to } B(4, 1) \\[5ex]
\text{horizontal change} = 4 - 0 = 4 \\[3ex]
\text{new horizontal change} = 2 \cdot 4 = 8 \\[3ex]
\text{new x-coordinate} = 0 + 8 = 8 \\[5ex]
\text{vertical change} = 1 - (-1) = 2 \\[3ex]
\text{new vertical change} = 2 \cdot 2 = 4 \\[5ex]
\text{new y-coordinate} = -1 + 4 = 3 \\[5ex]
B' = (8, 3) \\[5ex]
\text{Image of C, } C' \\[3ex]
\text{centre} (0, -1) \text{ to } C(3, 0) \\[5ex]
\text{horizontal change} = 3 - 0 = 3 \\[3ex]
\text{new horizontal change} = 2 \cdot 3 = 6 \\[3ex]
\text{new x-coordinate} = 0 + 6 = 6 \\[5ex]
\text{vertical change} = 0 - (-1) = 1 \\[3ex]
\text{new vertical change} = 2 \cdot 1 = 2 \\[5ex]
\text{new y-coordinate} = -1 + 2 = 1 \\[5ex]
C' = (6, 1) \\[5ex]
\text{Image of D, } D' \\[3ex]
\text{centre} (0, -1) \text{ to } D(2, 1) \\[5ex]
\text{horizontal change} = 2 - 0 = 2 \\[3ex]
\text{new horizontal change} = 2 \cdot 2 = 4 \\[3ex]
\text{new x-coordinate} = 0 + 4 = 4 \\[5ex]
\text{vertical change} = 1 - (-1) = 2 \\[3ex]
\text{new vertical change} = 2 \cdot 2 = 4 \\[5ex]
\text{new y-coordinate} = -1 + 4 = 3 \\[5ex]
D' = (4, 3) \\[3ex]
$
Alternatively, we can do it by formula:
$
\text{For an enlargement of an object } (x, y) \text{ with:} \\[3ex]
\text{scale factor, } k \\[3ex]
\text{about a centre, } (c, d) \\[3ex]
\text{the image, } (x', y')= [c + k(x - c), d + k(y - d)] \\[5ex]
(c, d) = (0, -1) \\[3ex]
k = 2 \\[5ex]
\text{For } A(2, 3) \\[3ex]
A' = [0 + 2(2 - 0), -1 + 2(3 - (-1))] \\[3ex]
= [0 + 2(2), -1 + 2(4)] \\[3ex]
= (0 + 4, -1 + 8) \\[3ex]
= (4, 7) \\[5ex]
\text{For } B(4, 1) \\[3ex]
B' = [0 + 2(4 - 0), -1 + 2(1 - (-1))] \\[3ex]
= [0 + 2(4), -1 + 2(2)] \\[3ex]
= (0 + 8, -1 + 4) \\[3ex]
= (8, 3) \\[5ex]
\text{For } C(3, 0) \\[3ex]
C' = [0 + 2(3 - 0), -1 + 2(0 - (-1))] \\[3ex]
= [0 + 2(3), -1 + 2(1)] \\[3ex]
= (0 + 6, -1 + 2) \\[3ex]
= (6, 1) \\[5ex]
\text{For } D(2, 1) \\[3ex]
D' = [0 + 2(2 - 0), -1 + 2(1 - (-1))] \\[3ex]
= [0 + 2(2), -1 + 2(2)] \\[3ex]
= (0 + 4, -1 + 4) \\[3ex]
= (4, 3) \\[3ex]
$
The diagram with the image of Quadrilateral
H after undergoing an enlargement with a scale factor of
2 about the centre $(0, -1)$ is:
(ii.) For any point, (
x, y):
Reflection across the line: $y = -x$ gives $(-y, -x)$
$
\underline{\text{Reflection in the line } y = -x} \\[3ex]
A(2, 3) \rightarrow A'(-3, -2) \\[3ex]
B(4, 1) \rightarrow B'(-1, -4) \\[3ex]
C(3, 0) \rightarrow C'(0, -3) \\[3ex]
D(2, 1) \rightarrow D'(-1, -2) \\[3ex]
$
The diagram with the image of Quadrilateral
H after a reflection in the line $y = -x$ is:
(c.) Let us represent the information diagrammatically as shown:
$
(i.) \\[3ex]
90 + 90 + 90 + \angle MNL = 291^\circ \quad\text{Bearing of } M \text{ from } N \\[3ex]
\angle MNL = 291 - 270 \\[3ex]
= 21^\circ \\[5ex]
(ii.) \\[3ex]
\underline{\text{1st Approach: Sine Rule}} \\[3ex]
\dfrac{|LM|}{\sin \angle MNL} = \dfrac{|LN|}{\sin \angle LMN} \quad\text{Sine Rule} \\[5ex]
\dfrac{|LM|}{\sin 21^\circ} = \dfrac{15}{\sin 110^\circ} \\[5ex]
|LM| = \dfrac{15\sin 21}{\sin 110} \\[5ex]
= \dfrac{5.375519243}{0.9396926208} \\[5ex]
= 5.720508094 \\[3ex]
\approx 5.72\;km \quad\text{to 3 significant figures} \\[5ex]
\underline{\text{2nd Approach: Cosine Rule}} \\[3ex]
|LM|^2 = |MN|^2 + |LN|^2 - 2 \cdot |MN| \cdot |LN| \cdot \cos \angle MNL \quad\text{Cosine Rule} \\[3ex]
|LM|^2 = 12^2 + 15^2 - 2(12)(15) \cos 21^\circ \\[3ex]
= 144 + 225 - 360(0.9335804265) \\[3ex]
= 369 - 336.0889535 \\[3ex]
= 32.9110465 \\[3ex]
|LM| = \sqrt{32.9110465} \\[3ex]
= 5.736815014 \\[3ex]
\approx 5.74\;km \quad\text{to 3 significant figures} \\[3ex]
$
Student: SamDom For Peace
Teacher: What's good?
Student: I thought that is we use the Sine Rule and the Cosine Rule, we should get the same final
answer before it is rounded.
Is my assumption right or wrong?
Teacher: Yes, we should get the same final answer. Your assumption is right.
Student: Could you explain the discrepancy in this situation?
Teacher: What do you think?
Student: I think there must have been some rounded values in the diagram.
Teacher: That is a possibility.
Student: In this case, is it better to use the Cosine Rule or the Sine Rule?
Teacher: Cosine Rule is used when ...
Student: we are given two sides and an included angle: SAS
Teacher: Sine Rule is used when ...
Student: Two angles and a side (ASA or AAS)
Teacher: We are given these values, so either rule is fine and should give the same result.
Student: So, is it fair to say that the triangle in that question is not physically possible?
Teacher: Yes, if those values are the exact values.